The
scientist–practitioner model, also called the
Boulder model[1], is a training model for graduate programs that focuses on creating a foundation of research and scientific practice. It was developed primarily to train
clinical psychologists but has been adapted by other specialty programs. According to this model, a psychologist is a
scientist and a competent researcher, and also a practitioner who applies knowledge and techniques to solve problems of clients.
[2]The model traces its roots to the Boulder Conference on Graduate Education in Clinical Psychology (1949) held in Boulder, Colorado. The conference developed a model of training and education leading to professional practice in which Clinical Psychologists adhere to scientific methods, procedures, and research in their day-to-day practice. Some (e.g., Francine Shapiro) have reframed the model as clinical psychologists as applied scientists.[citation needed] The goal of the training, educational model, and eventual practice is for clinicians to use scientific methodology in their practice-decision; to work with clients using scientifically valid methods, tools, and techniques; to inform their clients of scientifically-based findings and approaches to their problems; and to conduct practice-based research.
Core tenets of the scientist–practitioner model include[3]
Some have questioned if is possible, in today's climate, to continue to expect practicing clinical psychologists to be able to adhere to the ideals and tenets of the scientist–practitioner model. Many clinicians find it difficult to complete their practical duties let alone conduct research (which often goes unfunded) or to remain up-to-date with cutting edge science.
