|
What a difference a day makes. This past Sat., June 9, 2012, saw one of the most controversialdecisions in boxing in years, as Timothy Bradley was awarded a split decision victory ( 115-113, 113-115, 115-113 ) over pound-for-pound great Manny Pacquiao at the MGM Grand GardenArena in Las Vegas, Nevada. The location of the bout is key, seeing as the outcry over the result has produced a level of disgust towards theNevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) and its practices that borders on sadistic. Fans are outraged;some are demanding answers while others have simply sworn off the sport altogether . For his part, Pacquiao disagreed with the judges but told fans tohang in there. Bradley, meanwhile, felt he did enough to win thefight but ultimately settled on the only real position he could --the judges made their call and he has to live with it, just likeeveryone else. But that's not really the case. Indeed, an investigation could be launched at the behest of NevadaAttorney General Catherine Cortez Masto. And Bob Arum, of allpeople, is leading the charge to make sure it happens. In fact,according to Yahoo! Sports , a rematch won't take place unless it does, even though Arum claimed he would "make a lot of money on it. " "I want to investigate whether there was any undue influence,whether the (Nevada Athletic Commission) gave any particularinstruction and how they came to this conclusion. But the wholesport is in an uproar. People are going crazy. If this was asubjective view that each of [the judges] honestly held, OK. Iwould still disagree, but then we're off the hook in terms of therebeing no conspiracy. But there needs to be an independentinvestigation because it strains credulity that an event everybodysaw as so one-sided one way all three judges saw it as close. Itstrains credulity." Keith Kizer, the Executive Director of the NSAC, has gone on record with the LA Times in the aftermath of the fight and said he "doesn't anticipate anydiscipline or review of Ross or Ford." C.J. Ross and Duane Ford are the two judges who scored the bout forBradley. In the case of the latter, he's come out and explained hisreasoning, saying he thought Bradley " gave Pacquiao a boxing lesson ." Assuming an investigation doesn't take place, as many believe itwill not, does that mean a rematch isn't going to happen? Thatseems unlikely, as Pacquiao has already stated unequivocally thathe wants it with Arum going along with that with the old line ofgiving Manny what Manny wants. There is, however, a small possibility that it doesn't happen.Indeed, ticket sales weren't nearly as strong as usual for "Pacman"fights and general interest in a rematch seems to be low . If 95-percent of the fans already believe Pacquiao won the fightanyway, what's the point in watching another? Bradley feels he has something to prove, for obvious reasons, andthe hope is that he could get through a second fight without injuring himself badly enough to need a wheelchair just to get tothe post-fight press conference . His handlers have said that if a second fight never comes topass, they'll simply move along to the next match-up, which couldinclude any number of opponents now that he can make the claim thathe knocked off Pacquiao. Even if no one else believes as much. Are you Maniacs on board with Arum's investigation or no rematchidea? Or are you just ready to move on past this controversy andwait for the second showdown later this year? For everything you need to know on Pacquiao vs. Bradley click here . The e-commerce company in China offers quality products such as Stainless Steel Beading Wire , Bead Wire Wrapping Manufacturer, and more. For more , please visit Cutting Wire Rope today!
Related Articles -
Stainless Steel Beading Wire, Bead Wire Wrapping Manufacturer,
|
