|
Knowing the contrast between operational speed and strategic pace is an important ingredient to managing a successful business. Quite a few company bosses focus excessively on accelerating the velocity by which practical tasks are completed which provides accelerated costs, along with a short term gain in customer numbers and purchases, which sometimes could at some point lead to extreme detriment to the company, employee development and the foundation of the panacea of all businesses, a smooth and efficient, almost pleasurable customer experience. There are two main forms of business in relation to speed of execution. The primary type features a sole priority of meeting deadlines, achieving temporary targets, that is definitely characterised through making demands without ample time for understanding exactly where the company is being taken. The second kind of business would be the the one that provides a long-term perspective and grows all sectors of the business together, or at a minimum in harness amongst each other. This results in a balance within the growth and continuing development of the business enterprise and not just converts the purchaser after they are actually captured, but adds the other ingredient, (reported by Peter Drucker), of keeping them: a factor often forgotten. The first variety of company sees the best way to gain almost any advantage over another company, or even their peers in that industry in general, comes from doing many things quicker. While they lurch from one sales campaign to another one, they perpetuate the unpredictable rollercoaster of sales, customer numbers, profits, costs and staff turnover they currently suffer from, after which amplify the actual down-side repeatedly as part of their bid to "get ahead". The employees feel undervalued, working situations are viewed as poor and stressful, and days lost due to "sickness" start creeping up. The culture is "do or die" and nobody enjoys their job anymore. The management start becoming reactive and scrutiny of individuals performing their role increases, while they hunt for anyone to blame. The second kind of company provides a different outlook. They already have workplace and business values running through everything that they do. Everybody in the company knows what their job is, the actual way it fits into the great scheme of things and where their contribution is helping the business achieve its goals. Grievances are paid attention to and treated openly and fairly. Sales are gained and customer care is supplied for virtually any post-sales needs or servicing in an orderly and logical way. Sales are produced and customers on-boarded with all the knowledge that value is something that is added and will subsequently result in greater prosperity for that business. This is not to convey that the first kind of company lacks leadership, in many cases they just do not. Occasionally, the leadership can be so strong that it must be solely that which is holding the firm together. Usually it is far from the total amount of leadership which is present, however the direction that leadership is heading that produces the problems. Frequently these leaders are extremely busy working "in" the business, they just do not have time to work "on" the company. Also, I wouldn't dare claim that there's an inability to strategize inside the first variety of companies, because there are often excellent strategists within most of these companies. The problem generally seems to lie with the operational timescale their particular strategies are planned over and the inability of others to complete that strategy in the way the originator intended: often strategies from various directors or partners are usually not always aligned, pulling in different directions. Now, I realise I will be only scratching the surface of the need because this challenge exists in up to 86% of companies sized from £1M to £100M profit pa. This topic, from strategy planning and strategy execution with long term perspective, incorporating "Conduct Risk" needs to be investigated by each firm with a view of exactly what it means to them specifically. There is significantly more to running a business than just increasing speed. For somebody who is doing something which isn't working, to increase speed falls into the meaning of insanity, i.e., doing the same thing but expecting different results. By taking a step back and spending time collaboratively using our specialist advice in identifying your optimal strategic goals at a sustainable pace. We can assist you in making longer-term infrastructure methods to improve and maintain company growth, expand margins, increase profits and ultimately produce a robust and valid "exit" or "final" value in a compliant and risk managed approach. At Compliance Consultant we can assist you with a free of charge questionnaire and explanatory PDF at http://www.complianceconsultant.org/pathfinder or just search "Pathfinder Evolution Compliance" and join the select collection of companies benefiting and making the most of this specialist planning, many are in the financial services industry. We operate under complete non-disclosure agreements in order to safeguard your confidentiality.
Related Articles -
marketing objectives, marketing plan, marketing strategy, regulation, operational risk, performance management, performance measurement, pra, pricing strategy,
| 
