|
Gianni Bugno, the head of cyclists associate professionals (CPA), the International Association of cycling, "said Lance Armstrong has to pay for what he has done for cycling, but paradoxically, he added that the sport should not focus on the past. Remember: the nineties, the reign of Miguel Indurain with the principles Chiapucci, Rominger, Bugno. cycling bandana Yes, we saw the tour live on TVE in Spain, and after each step, we went with friends to lead a platoon feel more European!. Devoured the small television images coming into the country, he read in a newspaper, sometimes months later, we did a video of the Tour de France (internet, no news yet.) Routes to be aware of two Spanish journals emblematic Bicisport bike and funds, which have not been signed, four months after reading. As a result, these means were merged and the magazine had a label a bit 'of time for funds Bicisport bike. Now attention bike also has a website, a people belonging to the Tour de San Luis in Argentina and inform us daily Gazzetta dello Sport, Team, Ciclismo.es, and a number of specialized fields. "It 's hard to talk about. For me, as a former athlete, I respect that. I can not say that it is a sample, but I respect him as an athlete. cycling jerseys china However, if he did something wrong, he must pay for it. Was not fair what he has done for cycling. You will pay for what he did, "said Bugno Cyclingnews. Last month Bugno, in his capacity as head of the CPA, appeared to accept the concept of truth and reconciliation in the package cycling. There seems to be a more dynamic concept too, even with the problem by adding support to the idea UCI. A lawyer Armstrong also made noises about it. Although there is no framework in force WADA seems the only organization with the ability to create a structure for cyclists, past and present, to appear. "When talking about the past, it is difficult to answer. Doping is a problem in all sports, not just cycling. cycling leg warmers I agree with the idea of ??telling the truth, but I do not see the point of looking into the past and in the present.'d rather talk about the future, even if I disagree with the ideology of talk about the past. ' "Talking about doping all the time is not good. The fight against doping is very strong and we need to focus on it. We can go into the past and look what happened with Armstrong and all that came out, but it is not good for cycling and this is what I heard recently talking with the riders. now, anyone who thinks thinks cycling doping. '
Related Articles -
cycling, leg, warmers,
|
