As projection and printing technology continue to improve, the use of visual aids in the classroom becomes more robust and easier to implement. Whether or not it's always best to use these technologies is a matter of contention. Though some feel strongly on both sides of the debate, most teachers can agree that visual aids are advisable in some situations and less appropriate in others. |
A picture can evoke emotion, curiosity or interest in a way simple words cannot. Students become more involved in their lessons if they can see a picture or film about a subject rather than simply hearing or reading about it.
Visual aids can quickly and efficiently demonstrate ideas that are difficult to explain verbally. Many core math, science and art concepts can only be effectively taught by showing students as well as, or instead of, simply telling them.
All students lean towards audio visual or kinesthetic learning as their chief learning mode. However, demonstrating concepts using two or more learning modes helps all students record and recall the information better. Explaining a concept while showing a visual aid does just that.
There are the odd disadvantages though, however. The process involved in Preparing visual aids can be time consuming, taking valuable energy away from other aspects of lesson planning. Likewise, many visual aids can be expensive. Purchasing them can take away funds from other programs / technologies.
If a visual aid relies on a technological device, teachers using that aid run the risk of technical failure or even failure of their own technical knowledge. Simple verbal instruction or reading lessons don't fail due to technical difficulties and AV does have a tendancy to go wring from time to time.
Related Articles -
Audio Visual, AV, Visual Aid,