|
Andrew Warinner answer to New Era kepsar Are we entering a new era in which navies will be crucial strategic assets solution hazy, repeat the process While there have been plenty of small scale to medium size ground wars since World War II in which technology, keys and tactics have been tried out, There haven't been any larger naval dustups and only a handful of small scale naval shootouts to judge what works and what doesn If the airplane revolutionised  naval warfare by sinking hugely expensive capital ships with handfuls of relatively cheap airplanes, The drone/UAV/UCAV could change it again, properly introducing asymmetric warfare to the seas where even cheaper New Era cappelli online remotely piloted vehicles could attack extremely expensive surface warships,/p> But it New Era keps would not be quite as very easy as on land,/p> A lot of drones are devoted to reconnaissance true chicago pizzaria? a less pressing need for that afloat; Warships can carry a goodly amount of sensors by themself,/p> A UCAV capable of carrying a ship killing missile would need to be big, really big. The Hellfire missile used on the Predator and Reaper drones weighs in at about 49 kilograms with a 9 kg warhead. The Exocet bomb weighs around 680 kg with a 160 kg warhead. The Silkworm missile weighs around 3000 kg with up to a 500 kg warhead. and ofcourse this: A ship killing weapon has to pack a big punch and the drone that carries it has to be communicating large,/p> Big drones are pricey: the world Hawk[1] deals about $35 million per unit. The JSF F35 now costs $135 million per jet. That New Era keps a huge difference but a pricetag of tens of millions per UCAV would mean that poor nations would find it hard to get into asymmetric naval warfare with drones,/p> Big drones have another issue: They would be prone to smaller (And at a lower cost) Drones,/p> Drone evolution seems to be recapitulating the evolution of the military aircraft. Airplanes begun doing reconnaissance, boxers evolved to shoot down reconnaissance planes and bombers evolved to bomb,/p> we will be at the reconnaissance stage for drones now. What antidrone drones would represent, We don know but I guess there would still be a need for some carrierlike surface vessel for power screening machine,/p> So the future could look like this: Carriers flying UCAVs instead manned aircraft protected by a range of surface ships and submarines being the pinnacle of pwer projection,/p> [1] Global Hawk is a reconnaissance platform but it is usually big: Global Hawk has a gross weight of 10,000 kg and a correspondingly big sale price. Big and expensive means that self defense purposes systems like ECM capabilities are tacked on, Thus increasing the size and expense,/p> It not clear if drones in a position to carrying weapons big enough to sink surface ships will reverse or just delay the cost death spiral of naval aviation,/p>
Related Articles -
New, Era, cappelli, online,
|
