Field sobriety tests. Normal tests include horizontal stare nystagmus (otherwise understood as HGN), walk and turn, one leg stand, counting backwords, touch your nose, and state the alphabet. If you've never seen an authorities policeman give the tests, you most likely did them in university at a fraternity party. To hear a police officer tell it, the failure of field sobriety tests is concrete proof that somebody is too drunk to drive. If you can't walk nine actions heel to toe and reverse and take nine more actions you must be drunk, right? Wrong. In reality field sobriety tests inform policeman one thing - the possibility that someone is too drunk to drive - and this is only if the tests are done under optimal testing conditions. Let me give you an example. Our information is gathered from lawyer bankruptcy. At that time a Kirkland police officer pulls you over for failing to turn in a perfect half circle (or some other individual arbitrary infraction) and asks if you have actually had anything to consume. This is when the policeman asks you to take the field sobriety tests - I suggest, if you haven't been drinking you must be able to pass them right (even though in Seattle and Kirkland and almost everywhere else in Washington State you can decline to take field sobriety tests as part of your constitutional right to continue to be quiet). He asks you to carry out three tests: the walk and turn, the one leg stand, and the horizontal stare nystagmus tests. He wouldn't ask you to take the field sobriety tests unless he already had some uncertainty that you were drunk driving. Second, even if you do all the tests stone cold sober, there is about a 17 % possibility that you will have been found to have failed! Tests carried out using field sobriety tests discovered that the walk and turn tests revealed a right assessment 75 % of the time, the one leg stand 75 % of the time, and the HGN 81 % of the time. You were likely to properly assess whether or not somebody was in fact too drunk to drive just 83 % of the time if you did all 3 together. This is why they have the breath test (whose precision is likewise questioned, though, undoubtedly with a various kind of mistake and mistake rate) - field sobriety tests really don't work that efficient all. To hear an authorities officer tell it, the failure of field sobriety tests is concrete proof that somebody is too drunk to drive. In truth field sobriety tests tell authorities officers one thing - the probability that someone is too drunk to drive - and this is only if the tests are done under ideal testing conditions. This is when the officer asks you to take the field sobriety tests - I indicate, if you haven't been consuming you need to be able to pass them right (even though in Seattle and Kirkland and almost everywhere else in Washington State you can refuse to take field sobriety tests as part of your constitutional right to stay silent). He asks you to conduct 3 tests: the walk and turn, the one leg stand, and the horizontal gaze nystagmus tests. Tests performed utilizing field sobriety tests found that the walk and turn tests showed a correct assessment 75 % of the time, the one leg stand 75 % of the time, and the HGN 81 % of the time. To find out additional info check out how much is a bankruptcy lawyer.
Related Articles -
Johnson Legal INC., JLG Corporation Review, university district, washington,
|