Racial Genetics |
Savages in our midst ?
Are there different species of men living side by side unaware of the differences between them ? Are there for example people whose neurological circuitry has evolved differently and or not evolved at all since the early dawn of Man ? This and many other questions guaranteed to raise goose pimples in those who wrap themselves up in the understanding that we are all equal in the sight of our God/s are now being meticulously studied by professional and amateurs alike. However, it is something that modern investigators in the areas of motivation and ideological neural drivers are beginning to take seriously from a national security point of view. That to some extent is an added problem because the nature o f the matter is fraught with national security and potential public prejudice. Up to now however, the unwillingness to tackle the issue has not been the lack of interest in the subject, but the difficulties encountered in a field monopolized by the academic world. The increasing amount of social violence however and the tendency of some racial groupings to enter constantly into conflict and even genocide has raised the academic antennae to bring the subject out into the open. Questions like, are some countries likely to have a much higher percentage of genetically dangerous people ? Are known neurological syndromes part of a deficiency or modified alteration incapable of working side by side with the so called “normal” man ? Again, what chances do those with increased aggressiveness or paranoid ambitions, have with respect to the ladder of success - meaning authority or power ?
Changes and primitive persistence
We are aware of the two distinct sides of the human brain. We are also aware of the differences of connections between them in some members of the same family and the behaviour patterns between those we call doves and hawks in any given circle. We also know of some of the genetic modifications like those with Thalassemia and Sickle cell anemia which saved the human race from extinction from Malaria - at least, but bringing in other severe clinical problems. And how many more changes are not altogether evident but endow the mutant difficult - if not to say dangerous traits ? Autism and Aspergers for example are sometimes difficult to detect but there is no shadow of doubt about average characteristic behaviour patterns - good and bad- from a care point of view. But is all this just circumstantial and too much a rare minority to even bother to concern ourelves about its impact on everyday society ? Or are they tentacles of irreversible genetic makeup that could modify into inscrutable behaviour and enter the competition chain ? That again, is beginning to raise some hair in the inner sanctuaries of political faculties. The psychopath, for example, is now seen as normal among normals as say a red head in an Iberian court. Which is to say that “vive le difference” is alive and well – but is this a safe approach to the management of the masses or even the family for that matter ? Obviously not, since from day one – the chances are that insensitive people could survive beyond his/her counterpart and the latter may one day just be caught unawares by the former – a disquieting thought. Echoes of Cain and Abel – Esau and Jacob - among myriads of others mentioned in ancient literature are base examples of unacceptable and abhorrent behavior which needed underlying by the teachers. Today, the apparently increasing family violence and in particular, gender derived ones , ring alarmingly, as much as the realization that a handful of bullies within societies often drive the rest to destruction. How did these paranoid people get there ? Clearly , evolution, if these are successful mutants endowed with extra capacity to survive by their behaviour and single mindedness, may be going down a dangerous dead end ?
The wrong critical mutations.
Good and bad mutations are generally diehard genetic factors endorsed by millions of years of survival, but unless controlled, the viciousness and insensitivity derived of genetic inheritance in some will unquestionably rise to the top. But could it spread itself in so doing ? Humans unlike large scale breeding animal life, with shorter spans, are in a critical balance when it comes to change. Self awareness and sophisticated critical abilities can detect unusual and or potentially difficult changes in others, but less defined in cautious people with reservations about others, would probably go unnoticed until too late. The news has been more than ordinarily packed with savagery and mass killings from the most inoffensive quarters, like time bombs waiting for the slot. In all cases, unpredictable behavior has been attributed when in fact tendencies and built in stresses causes by genetic differences we often attribute to depressive factors, have been clearly seen in their wake but acted on only when the deeds were done. It is almost as if most of their contacts are unprepared to accept the implications or determine when to raise the alarm signals. Such was the case with the French Pilot who took his human cargo down with him.
But what if genetically modified people also inherit positive factos, like visible intelligence and charm encouraged perhaps by an increased dependence on others, enables them to reach to the top with relative ease ? If insensitivity enables unabashed lying and destructive determination goes alongside, they will, until caught, go places. Aggressiveness may be one obvious supporting factor, but what about the charm that our domestic pets often utilize to our detriment ? Not a banal comment, but a very real one when it comes to humans. The Mansons of these world did not get there, nor did Sutcliffe, merely because of studied approach. Neither did Hitler or Idi Amin of Uganda, despite the obvious repulsion, owe their success merely to bullying. The single mindedness of a psychopath was attached to other specific attributes that left mountains of corpses and a broken race exposed to the results of their tacit, albeit fear driven, support.
If genes through some process of character expression are more attractive to women generally, than say the humble and seemingly weak natured, then the streak of dominance or violence which lead to power, will eventually rule the roost – and this is apparently what appears to be happening. It is this aggressiveness that manipulates the party political system in particular and either remains in the background as devil advocates, or puts itself on the fore with equally damning effect. What begs the question is whether the mental wiring, from the start, is of a very different order to the norm (if there is such a thing). This line of investigation alone, is more than difficult to follow in view of the fact that it can branch out in myriads of direction. One line would simply be the question of whether the genetic difference reorganized survival priorities in the brain with increased alertness and or also blocked out compassion or sensitivity. In short, a reptilic line of thought and vision. There are people like that who are contained within a level of social restraint, but given the undue provocation, could it trigger that savagery uncontrollably ? There is a great deal of information gathered today, to suggest that this is so. In fact, it would not be surprising if controls, from an early stage , however undemocratic in substance, would not be as much a part of state education, as say, the search for exploitable brilliance is, today.
Media Influences in genetic transmission
A disturbing factor in the promotion of empty archetypal images, is modern advertising and fashionable fads, which wrap them in false glamour and imbed them deeply in the mind´s eye. The choice of fitting partners is often conditioned by these things and James Bond will of course prevail, but do they vote for and marry their well proportioned idols ? Not always, but the recoil from the Macho image by woman who find these glossy figures unattainable, could be just as bad, as aggression in mental weaklings or cretinism – replace the ideal balance and pass their genes on unsuspectingly. This is clearly seen in mountainous countries where small communities with high percentages of primeval inhabitants for millennia held their genetic forts and concentrated their traits through inbreeding unwittingly creating in some cases, leaders of the future when their strong and simple minded members leave to join the warring crowds of the anonymous cities. This could explain why in some national societies there are so many intransigent and belligerent people. There may be other reasons for this of course, like the genetic isolation aforementioned and caused by cultural barriers but the predominance of one or another single characteristic evident to outsiders is more than likely due to copulation selection or rather primary choice. The subject of genetic isolation in communities is too vast to go into in short treatises, but cretinism which is high in rural countries is an example of this. It is also an indication that early man or even his predecessors in one aspect or another, is till there and that they can often sire without due public attention, people with a potential for bad. Present terrorism is marked with such cases of exceedingly cruel and totally insensitive delinquents who got to the top of their tree because of these primitive and genetically transferred zest for gore and destruction – characteristics which are not shared, however stressed, by the majority of people in the world who in the main, would not even be able to defend themselves violently.
It is mainly man because of his highly evolved self awareness who is capable of redesigning himself voluntarily and without strict discipline and moral resolve, the end results could easily be self destruction. Self fulfillment can deny moral and ethical issues, but behind it must be an aggressive or blinding genetic factor to ride rough over others. If mutations bring about these supporting hidden strengths and these characteristics dominate others more successfully, the end results could be the widespread devastation we see today when burning whole families alive and cutting off of peoples heads forms part of everyday life. But then incredibly, it forms part of visual training unwittingly presented as games and entertainment. This added factor of contemporary skills and forms of leisure, must be seen in the context of added genetic currents and fashionable influences - a cocktail of potential that probably begs the question as to how bad it could get . Frankly, intelligent life was not meant to be so exposed to lack of sense of direction.
The birth of the “Yuppie” - an undesirable character full of bravura and false impressions like the stereotype with skis permanently on the car roof, was a creation of Margaret Thatcher who set trends that were in many ways disturbing. “Up and go” meant callous smash and grab single mindedness, no matter what in the way. It derived from “This woman is not for turning” and the hard faced easy rider, incapable of success in more respectable and effort laden ways, set the path for lies, ethical manipulation and in some cases murder as with the first case which shocked Britain of an employee shooting an employer for having the audacity to fire him. Public recognition of failure had become a crime. Positive thinking may have bounds. The psychopaths would without doubt find this open door tempting, to say the least and would in future have their day as the crime would be contained within being found out. The fields of law enforcement, private security, political and mercenary businesses, like say immigration and prostitution services would glean their taskmasters with much greater ease as bullying became acceptable and replaced merit.
In some African countries the teeth and eye movements of heavily painted men draw the main percentage of mates disregardful of any other factors which could be better suited to tribal needs. On the same vein, in modern Mediterranean countries the massive investment by males on total body hair removal to emulate the Nordic/ Saxon models which dominate the television screens, is causing an effeminate process which are driving local females to go for the real thing in foreigners. Marrying someone from outside has never been more popular in the Mediterranean basin, for example despite the racist tendency to blame outsiders for everything that goes wrong in their society. The social tensions that these factors create are worth reading in the local press and often, broken marriages and affected children are the result. This is but one example of how the culturally contained gene pool can be broken for better or for worse. Whatever, conscious studies of these aspects of modern globalization are probably as urgent as the climatic changes.
Finally, similar genetic games appear to be acting within ideologically motivated groups. The most aggressive, devoid of a good education often become the vehement manipulators of religious teachings who in turn serve the purpose of the real puppeteers. Their victims are usually very dependent on religious answers for acceptance of their primitive existence (apart from the fear of retribution). This is a primary recruitment force in the creation of powerful suicidal entities headed by primitive minds incapable of thinking beyond conquest and power. Their weapons - as amply illustrated - aggression and the dissemination of fear which lock into the buried power of human mystical belief. Such psychological attachment to survival and family protection by ingenuous belief in the religious teacher is beyond the average needful person to ignore. In fact, only giants of defiance and moral strength can even remotely attempt to gather resistance. Minors torn from their families and friends having suffered the conversion to habitual gore, feel unable to go back to their childhood if they survive the experience. Additionally, glory through military brotherhoods like the Medieval cohorts, becomes a form of neo-achievement which is missing in their normal, desolate and impossible lives. Only in these contexts can parental acquiescence sealed by ignorance, be properly understood by the overfed masses. Evolutionary systems are, it would appear, not working towards ends that survival of the fittest , in the first instance, intended they should. It means, terrifyingly, that the whirlpool of genetic deviation has gathered a momentum that could lead to involuntary self destruction through social and political violence - hitherto unknown. It could mean the annihilation of the human race as it ignores the unshackled mechanism that was supposed to improve controls and quality of life – the selection process. Survival of the fittest now means war – never ending war, but biological and nuclear weaponry was not in the picture when human awareness was born - and thereby hangs the deadly tail.
Related Articles -
racial genetics, genetics, politics, psycopath, war causes, races, culture, aspergers, autism, evolution,