|
|
 |
|
|
Soldiers who desecrate the dead see themselves as hunters by wwy yrj
|
|
|
Soldiers who desecrate the dead see themselves as hunters by WWY YRJ
|
|
| Article Posted: 11/30/2012 |
| Article Views: 44 |
| Articles Written: 1412 - MORE ARTICLES FROM THIS AUTHOR |
| Word Count: 591 |
| Article Votes: 0 |
|
Soldiers who desecrate the dead see themselves as hunters |
|
|
|
|
|
Business,Business News,Business Opportunities
|
|
"The roots of this behaviour lie not in individualpsychological disorders," says Professor Simon Harrison whocarried out the study, "but in a social history of racism andin military traditions that use hunting metaphors for war. Althoughthis misconduct is very rare, it has persisted in predictablepatterns since the European Enlightenment. This was the period whenthe first ideologies of race began to appear, classifying somehuman populations as closer to animals than others." European and North American soldiers who have mutilated enemycorpses appear to have drawn racial distinctions of this sortbetween close and distant enemies. They 'fought' their closeenemies, and bodies remained untouched after death, but they'hunted' their distant enemies and such bodies became the trophiesthat demonstrate masculine skill.
Almost always, only enemies viewed as belonging to other 'races'have been treated in this way. "This is a specificallyracialised form of violence," suggest Professor Harrison,"and could be considered a type of racially-motivated hatecrime specific to military personnel in wartime." People tend to associate head-hunting and other trophy-taking with'primitive' warfare. They consider wars fought by professionalmilitaries as rational and humane. However, such contrasts aremisleading.
The study shows that the symbolic associations betweenhunting and war that can give rise to abnormal behaviour such astrophy-taking in modern military organisations are remarkably closeto those in certain indigenous societies where practices such ashead-hunting were a recognised part of the culture. In both cases, mutilation of the enemy dead occurs when enemies arerepresented as animals or prey. Parts of the corpse are removedlike trophies at 'the kill'. Metaphors of 'war-as-hunting' that lieat the root of such behaviour are still strong in some armed forcesin Europe and North America -- not only in military training but inthe media and in soldiers' own self-perception. Professor Harrison gives the example of the Second World War andshows that trophy-taking was rare on the European battlefields butwas relatively common in the war in the Pacific, where some Alliedsoldiers kept skulls of Japanese combatants as mementos or madegifts of their remains to friends back home.
The study also gives a more recent comparison: there have beenincidents in Afghanistan in which NATO personnel have desecratedthe dead bodies of Taliban combatants but there is no evidence ofsuch misconduct occurring in the conflicts of the former Yugoslaviawhere NATO forces were much less likely to have considered theiropponents racially 'distant'. But, it would be wrong to suggest that such behaviour amounts to atradition. These practices are usually not explicitly taught.Indeed, they seem to be quickly forgotten after the end of wars andveterans often remain unaware of the extent to which they occurred. Furthermore, attitudes towards the trophies themselves change asthe enemy ceases to be the enemy. The study shows how human remainskept by Allied soldiers after the Pacific War became unwantedmemory objects over time, which ex-servicemen or their familiesoften donated to museums.
In some cases, veterans have made greatefforts to seek out the families of Japanese soldiers in order toreturn their remains and to disconnect themselves from a disturbingpast. Professor Harrison concludes that human trophy-taking is evidenceof the power of metaphor in structuring and motivating humanbehaviour. "It will probably occur, in some form or other,whenever war, hunting and masculinity are conceptuallylinked," he says. "Prohibition is clearly not enough toprevent it.
We need to recognise the dangers of portraying war interms of hunting imagery." Further information. I am an expert from Home & Garden, usually analyzes all kind of industries situation, such as pest control roaches , pest control product.
Related Articles -
pest control roaches, pest control product,
|
Rate This Article  |
|
|
|
|
|
Do you Agree or Disagree? Have a Comment? POST IT!
| Reader Opinions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author Login |
|
|
 |
Advertiser Login
ADVERTISE HERE NOW!
Limited Time $60 Offer!
90 Days-1.5 Million Views
|
|
TIM FAY
After 60-plus years of living, I am just trying to pass down some of the information that I have lea...more
|
|
|
|
|
LAURA JEEVES
At LeadGenerators, we specialise in content-led Online Marketing Strategies for our clients in the t...more
|
|
|
|
|
ALEX BELSEY
I am the editor of QUAY Magazine, a B2B publication based in the South West of the UK. I am also the...more
|
|
|
|
|
STEPHEN BYE
Stephen Bye is a fiction writer. His most recent novels are a 5-book “The Developer” series which be...more
|
|
|
|
|
PAUL PHILIPS
For more articles, blog messages & videos and a free e-book download go to www.NewParadigm.ws your p...more
|
|
|
|
|
LEVAL AINAH
I am an internet marketer and also an educator. My goal is to help others who are looking to improve...more
|
|
|
|
|
GENE MYERS
Author of four books and two screenplays; frequent magazine contributor. I have four other books "in...more
|
|
|
|
|
ADRIAN JOELE
I have been involved in nutrition and weight management for over 12 years and I like to share my kn...more
|
|
|
|
|
MICHAEL BRESCIANI
Rev Bresciani is the author of two Christian books. One book is an important and concisely written b...more
|
|
|
|
