|
Lawyers for Todd Bertuzzi and Orca Bay, the company that owns theVancouver Canucks, have lost an appeal to keep secret the detailsof an agreement that shares costs between them should they lose a$38 million lawsuit brought against them by Steve Moore. Moore's lawyer, Tim Danson, learned of the agreement earlier thisyear and won a decision to have it released to him, but not forpublic disclosure. Justice Paul Perell, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice,upheld that decision, writing "since the structure of thesettlement agreement has already been disclosed, the non-disclosureof the details of the proportional sharing is more harmful than thecomplete disclosure". The nature of the agreement came to light when Bertuzzi quietlydropped his third-party lawsuit against former Vancouver Canuckscoach Mark Crawford. Bertuzzi claimed Crawford's negligence ascoach contributed to his infamous sucker punch on Steve Moore in2004. In arguing to keep the settlement agreement secret, Bertuzzi'slawyer, Geoff Adair, submitted "one of the overriding concerns thedefendants have with the current Order for disclosure is thatplaintiff's counsel will now be in a position to make full use ofthe Settlement Agreement to advance the theme to the trier of fact[the jury] at every turn that the defendants have acted in concertto 'hide' the facts by 'paying off' Bertuzzi to drop the claimagainst Crawford." Citing precedent, Danson argued "The Court of Appeal has held thatthese types of agreements change 'the landscape of the litigationand must be immediately disclosed. The distinctions advocated bythe defendants in this appeal are antithetical to the very publicpolicy principle the court seeks to maintain." In his 25-page ruling released Monday, Justice Perrel concludesthat because Bertuzzi dropped his third-party lawsuit againstCrawford and against Orca Bay and that Orca Bay dropped it'scrossclaim against Bertuzzi, the three entities were no longeradversaries. "The court needs to understand the precise nature of theadversarial orientation of the litigation in order to maintain theintegrity of it's process," wrote Justice Perrel. Danson would not comment beyond his written submission when reachedat his Toronto office. "Clearly, the defendants plan was to revealthe dismissal of the cross-claims at the last possible moment tomaximize the prejudice to the plaintiffs and go through the entiretrial without the plaintiffs, the trial judge and the jury everknowing about the significant financial incentive offered toBertuzzi in order to have a united front against the plaintiffs, "he wrote. Bertuzzi and Orca Bay could continue to appeal this ruling inDivisional Court. Geoff Adair, Bertuzzi's lawyer, could not be reached for comment. We are high quality suppliers, our products such as Silicone Calculator , Ultrasonic Aroma Diffuser for oversee buyer. To know more, please visits Silicone Kitchenware.
Related Articles -
Silicone Calculator, Ultrasonic Aroma Diffuser,
|
