|
"But there's a problem. A world of automatic, always-ondisclosure should give us pause," says Neil M. Richards, JD,privacy law expert and professor of law at Washington University inSt. Louis. "'Frictionless sharing' isn't really frictionless -- it forceson us the new frictions of worrying who knows what we're readingand what our privacy settings are wherever and however we readelectronically. It's also not really sharing -- real sharing isconscious sharing, a recommendation to read or not to readsomething rather than a data exhaust pipe of mental activity. "Rather than 'over-sharing,' we should share better, whichmeans consciously, and we should expand the limited legalprotections for intellectual privacy rather than dismantlingthem." Richards says that what's at stake is "intellectualprivacy," his term for the idea that records of our readingand movie watching deserve special protection compared to otherkinds of personal information. "The films we watch, the books we read, and the websites wevisit are essential to the ways we try to understand the world welive in," he says." "Intellectual privacy protects our ability to think forourselves, without worrying that other people might judge us basedon what we read. It allows us to explore ideas that other peoplemight not approve of, and to figure out our politics, sexuality andpersonal values, among other things. "Sharing and commenting on books, films and ideas is theessence of free speech." Richards notes that the work of the American Libraries Associationand its Office of Intellectual Freedom (OIF) offers an attractivesolution to the problem of reader records. "The OIF has argued passionately and correctly for theimportance of solitary reading as well as the ethical need forthose who enable reading -- librarians, but also Internet companies-- to protect the privacy and confidentiality of readingrecords," he says. "The norms of librarians suggest one successful and provensolution -- professionals and companies holding reader records mustonly disclose them with the express conscious consent of thereader. "The stakes in this debate are immense. Choices we make nowabout the boundaries between our individual and social selves,between consumers and companies, between citizens and the state,will have massive consequences for the societies our children andgrandchildren inherit.". We are high quality suppliers, our products such as China Male Sex Enhancement , China Natural Slimming Capsule for oversee buyer. To know more, please visits Female Sexual Enhancement Pills.
Related Articles -
China Male Sex Enhancement, China Natural Slimming Capsule,
|
