|
Samsung Laptop batteries ">Apple and Samsung has been to resolve their long-standing patent disputes and negotiations in February this year, close to reaching a settlement. However, not surprisingly, reached a settlement agreement seems a long way to go. Patent disputes between them in the event before it gets better, is bound to become even more bizarre. U.S. International Trade Commission (The US International Trade Commission, hereinafter referred to as ITC) will shortly be the second case Apple Samsung patent case ruling, but this will really muddy the waters. ITC in June this year had become front-page news, ITC was called in a "337 - 794" patent case ruled in favor of Samsung's ruling. In that case the patent case, ITC ruled that Apple violated Samsung's communications technology patents. This may result in Apple products (eg iPhone 4) not allowed to enter the U.S. market (the case is currently under review American president). The second case is a patent case, "337-796", is Apple accused Samsung. ITC will be August 1 final decision, but is expected to be ruled Samsung violated Apple patents, which in turn will lead to Samsung's older products can not enter the U.S. market. So is the case, ten days later, the two major global manufacturer of smart phones and devices may have some products was banned in the United States. But there is a bigger problem. Many complex intellectual property issues can be satisfactorily resolved through litigation, or Apple's patent case against Samsung's clear that companies need to improve innovation management? There is a perception that the two companies can better manage their intellectual property portfolio, and this is the real solution to the problem. Bloomberg outlined in Samsung patent case in 337-796 four alleged violations: iPhone and smooth top and bottom front edge of the wider design patent. It was also found to be infringing more touch screen function patents, another one patent covers displayed on the phone or computer screen translucent image of the application, as well as the headset is plugged into the jack on a method to detect patents. In the past week, Samsung has provided the background on this patent case presentations, focusing on design patents. Samsung in an understandable skepticism that Apple has managed to obtain a patent for one kind of shape. On the other hand, in the United States, on the "look and feel" patent is not uncommon. Since 2008, only one step you can more easily obtain evidence of design patent: the eyes of the ordinary observer, was accused of patent infringement and patent holder design is the design of roughly the same? In the United States, either to commit or to maintain, design patent cheaper than utility patents, but also more rapidly issued. Design patents are becoming increasingly popular. Patent Research Community Article One Partners Patent expert Cheryl Mallon (Cheryl Milone) say this is a good thing, because the design (especially the interface design) now is the key to opening up new markets. Before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Secretary David Couples (David J. Kappos) in April 2013 in the "national law" (National Law) magazine published an article echoed this view. This is a design story - innovators are making patents, trademarks and copyrights traditional scope of intellectual property have become blurred, they not only provide new products, but also through the appearance and function of the complexity of matching and easy to open new market. For these innovators, the present and the future of intellectual property and design the new frontier is increasingly intellectual property contained in the blend. If this seems to go along with Apple's success, then this is not surprising. Rather, it is the appearance of the iPhone has opened up the smart phone market. No matter what happens in the deep, Apple's major contribution to the market in its products compared with the previous product suitability. Myron think this deserves to be protected applicability. From Apple's perspective, it want their applicability in the product's original design to be protected. From Samsung's perspective, it wants its own production lines in product innovation in hardware and billions of dollars in investment is protected. Couples think we need to move beyond this debate and recognize that hold patents, copyrights and trademarks are not able to fully judge the current trend of intellectual property - the products, services, software integration among a series of design concepts. It also significantly reflect the current development trend of the U.S. economy - from manufacturing to creative intellectual property rights. If your economy does not depend on modern products in the manufacture of a nail a riveting (and expensive clean room), then it will be very easy to put forward this view. And this may be a full view of cultural relativism. So, how to bypass this view? Although it may be necessary to develop new regulations, but there is also a thing before us. Companies need a more comprehensive range of innovative architecture that can enable them in the product creation, manufacturing, connections, components, design and planning stages listed are capable of better supervision. The key is no longer a newly invented products or equipment. Innovation is the key to the company markets its ecosystem and the overall relationship. In this sense, Cobbs grabbed an important point. Its lesson is the company to better manage innovation. Samsung Laptop batteries
Related Articles -
Samsung,
| 
