After spending a significant amount of time and resources on developing an ASP.net site, using an international hosting company, instead of hosting it locally on your own server, is just like owning a Ferrari, but using kerosene oil to run it. In this article, we will analyze various hosting options available and find out that why hosting your own local in-house server is a better idea than outsourcing your hosting needs to other companies. We will consider uptime priority, security, customization and flexibility and cost parameters to compare these two hosting options.
First and the most important thing is priority for the uptime of your website or web application. As there are thousands of websites that are hosted by the international hosting and for them your site is just one among many. So despite promising a 99.9% uptime guarantee and 24 X 7 supports it simply isn’t practically possible for them to always resolve your issues on priority basis. While when it comes to your local in-house server, it’s always on the top priority, and everything is always in your control. For those of you have some experience of managing servers, they will understand that no matter how diligently you plan and your server administration process, issues do always creep up from the most unexpected corners. Be it the patch you just updated, even after testing in the sandbox or port conflicts with some new application, issues will always arrive.
Next is the security aspect of your data. When your data resides on a server that is hosting thousands of sites, despite virtualization, it is technically possible for it to be compromised by other rogue applications hosted on the same machine. As all the data ultimately resides in your physical location, where you have local servers, in case of any targeted attack you have the ultimate control of your data and the access to it.
Another major issue in Website windows hosting is optimization and fine tuning of the hosting Infrastructure to meet your particular requirement. We believe that each website and web application is unique. However as international hosting servers have to maintain several thousand sites on a single platform, it’s impossible for it to be fine-tuned to meet an individual client needs’ all the time. And as you move up on the innovation and productivity scale, your requirements will keep on getting more specific and can be met only by customization options that your in-house local hosting server can provide.
Finally it’s time to evaluate the cost of these two options. While initially it does appear that cost of outsourcing your hosting needs to international hosting companies might be lesser. This is because they are distributed over monthly payments, while installing in-house server does result in a significant initial cost. However, if you do a consolidated study of total incurred cost over the entire economic life cycle of your website / web applications, having an in-house server is definitely more cost effective. Also there will be no hassles of being stuck into complicated agreements by different hosting vendors.
Thus, after comparing between locally hosted servers and international window hosting companies on uptime priority, security, and customization flexibility and cost factors, it’s definitely more economical and effective to have an in-house local server hosting.
Related Articles -
best web hosting, web hosting hub, web hosting service, reseller hosting,